From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:04:37 EDT
Peter_Constable@sil.org scripsit:
> Of course, the point is, this is a particular situation where
>
> <base accent2 accent1>
>
> is canonically equivalent to
>
> <base accent1 accent2>
No, Mark had it right. These two are canonically equivalent and therefore
no normal Unicode process (including rendering) can treat them differently.
That's a fact. If we want to change that situation, we can use a different
encoding for one of the two renderings, or change the canonical-equivalence
rules.
-- There are three kinds of people in the world: John Cowan those who can count, http://www.reutershealth.com and those who can't. jcowan@reutershealth.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:39:23 EDT