Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician

From: Werner LEMBERG (wl@gnu.org)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 16:42:58 EDT

  • Next message: Karljürgen Feuerherm: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"

    > Is that the script where minimum comes out looking like:
    >
    > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
    >
    > (Ie, m => /\/\/\, n => /\/\, u => /\/\, i => /\ ?)
    >
    > NB how the i is dotless. (I can just see the [useless] debate
    > of whether that should then be encoded as U+0069 or U+0131. :)

    No. There must be a kind of `dot' for the i and a kind of `breve'
    sign above the u. Additionally, the connecting lines between the
    characters are wider, something like

                 / / \/

      /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /| /|
       |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/ |/

         Werner

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 17:32:51 EDT