From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 21:41:11 EST
"Patrick Andries" <Patrick.Andries@xcential.com>
> Well, some fonts would be better than none
> (and they have to be made so that
> the Unicode standard be printed).
In the case of complex scripts, a font sufficient to print a code chart is
nowhere near adequate to render that script properly.
If you code chart type glyphs are enough for you then on Windows if you have MS
Office there is always Arial Unicode.
- Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 22:34:15 EST