From: Peter Jacobi (peter_jacobi@gmx.net)
Date: Sun Dec 07 2003 - 15:09:33 EST
> At 2:43 pm +0100 7/12/03, Peter Jacobi wrote:
> 
> >Then you consider
> >   <span style='color:#00f'>ல</span>ொ
> >to be valid input, which ideally should render as intended?
> 
> I have uploaded a valid page to
> 
> <http://bd8.com/temp/tamil_unicode_tscii.html>
> 
> where you should see the lo properly displayed (in the second case). 
> As to the TSCII stuff I have simply followed your encodings, which 
> seem to give different glyphs, but maybe the first font in my list 
> (MylaiTSC) is encoded differently -- so much for unregistered legacy 
> encodings.
> 
> >Then you consider
> >   <span style='color:#00f'>ல</span>ொ
> >to be valid input, which ideally should render as intended?
> 
> In your TSCII version you write
> §<span>Ä</span>¡
> 
> is that not equivalent to Unicode
> 
> ெ<span>ல</span>ா
> 
> >>From a processing point of view, it is somehwat challenging, as you 
> >may have to parse through lots of markup, until you know what to do 
> >with the 0BB2.
> 
> That seems fairly easy.  I must be missing the point.
> 
> >As I've understood from other posts, the font support for
> >all this is theoretically available, but not often done in practice.
> 
> For Windows browsers I find I have to specify a Unicode font (in this 
> case Arial Unicode MS) in order for pages to display properly without 
> the user fiddling with his browser preferences.  As I said I have 
> WinNT 4.0 so maybe this has changed now.  The Mac browsers (Safari, 
> OmniWeb) require no font to be specified and will display the correct 
> characters no matter what the user's defaults.  I have nothing to do 
> with Mozilla.
> 
> JD
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 07 2003 - 15:48:44 EST