From: Peter Jacobi (peter_jacobi@gmx.net)
Date: Sun Dec 07 2003 - 15:09:33 EST
> At 2:43 pm +0100 7/12/03, Peter Jacobi wrote:
>
> >Then you consider
> > <span style='color:#00f'>ல</span>ொ
> >to be valid input, which ideally should render as intended?
>
> I have uploaded a valid page to
>
> <http://bd8.com/temp/tamil_unicode_tscii.html>
>
> where you should see the lo properly displayed (in the second case).
> As to the TSCII stuff I have simply followed your encodings, which
> seem to give different glyphs, but maybe the first font in my list
> (MylaiTSC) is encoded differently -- so much for unregistered legacy
> encodings.
>
> >Then you consider
> > <span style='color:#00f'>ல</span>ொ
> >to be valid input, which ideally should render as intended?
>
> In your TSCII version you write
> §<span>Ä</span>¡
>
> is that not equivalent to Unicode
>
> ெ<span>ல</span>ா
>
> >>From a processing point of view, it is somehwat challenging, as you
> >may have to parse through lots of markup, until you know what to do
> >with the 0BB2.
>
> That seems fairly easy. I must be missing the point.
>
> >As I've understood from other posts, the font support for
> >all this is theoretically available, but not often done in practice.
>
> For Windows browsers I find I have to specify a Unicode font (in this
> case Arial Unicode MS) in order for pages to display properly without
> the user fiddling with his browser preferences. As I said I have
> WinNT 4.0 so maybe this has changed now. The Mac browsers (Safari,
> OmniWeb) require no font to be specified and will display the correct
> characters no matter what the user's defaults. I have nothing to do
> with Mozilla.
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
-- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 07 2003 - 15:48:44 EST