RE: Coloured diacritics (Was: Transcoding Tamil in the presence of markup)

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sun Dec 07 2003 - 18:40:01 EST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Glottal stops (bis) (was RE: Missing African Latin letters (bis))"

    > Of course there is an even simpler way to provide the glue I was talking
    > about. W3C simply needs to relax the rule forbidding combining marks at
    > the start of a string (and interpret the one precomposed character with
    > ">" as base as if it were decomposed, as I suggested before), and,
    > remembering that use of NFC is a strong recommendation rather than a
    > requirement, not insist on NFC in such cases. Then nothing needs to be
    > added to Unicode.

    There's little chance that this will be relaxed by the W3C, because now
    HTML is XML (since XHTML is the current recommanded standard, and HTML
    4.01 is just kept as is, and all other extensions are being developped
    since XHTML 1.1 as modules with DTDs or XML schemas), and because XML text
    elements are independant. What you propose would break the XML containment
    model (could it be implemented however in XSLT transforms from XHTML? I
    doubt because the output of XSLT is also XML, even if it does not always
    produce a XML syntax, but only a DOM-parsable tree or InfoSet...)

    __________________________________________________________________
    << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
    Newsletters for me
    You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 07 2003 - 19:37:33 EST