Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Fri Dec 12 2003 - 15:16:08 EST

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Infiniteness"

Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: [OT?] The C standard library and UTF's (was RE: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics))"
In reply to: Andrew C. West: "Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 12/12/2003 09:27, Andrew C. West wrote:

> ...
>
>But why on earth are we talking about mapping grapheme clusters to the PUA ?! I
>thought we had heard the last of that sort of "heresy" when William softly and
>suddenly vanished away.
>
>Andrew
>
>
Strictly for internal use only, because Mark made the point that
indexing of grapheme clusters could be difficult. This snark was a
boojum, you see.

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter@qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Infiniteness"
Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: [OT?] The C standard library and UTF's (was RE: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics))"
In reply to: Andrew C. West: "Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 16:04:18 EST