RE: Stability of WG2

From: Arcane Jill ([email protected])
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 08:41:08 EST

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"

Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Next in thread: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Stability of WG2"
Maybe reply: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Stability of WG2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Speaking as a Brit, I would like to know the answer to this one too.
What's the problem with answering /on/line?

And if you're really /not/ going toanswer this online, you could have
just emailed Peter privately, instead of telling the whole list that
you're going to keep the answer secret from all of us except Peter. What
a wind up!

Jill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Everson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Stability of WG2
>
>
> At 04:36 -0800 2003-12-16, Peter Kirk wrote:
>
> >Seriously, can you remind us briefly what the situation is, why
> >there is no current UK representation?
>
> I will answer this off-line.
> --
> Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
>

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Next in thread: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Stability of WG2"
Maybe reply: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Stability of WG2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 09:24:06 EST