From: Jim Allan (jallan@smrtytrek.com)
Date: Thu Dec 18 2003 - 12:52:37 EST
Arcane Jill wrote:
> You are saying that ... in the
> days of punched cards ... there was an EBCDIC code whose meaning was
> LOGICAL NOT. So far so good - but how would such a character code have
> been /written/? Was it written like the U+00AC glyph is now?
Yes, exactly the same.
It appeared in original EBCDIC in 1964. See
http://homepages.cwi.nl/~dik/english/codes/stand.html#ebcdic
It appeared on IBM mainframe terminal keyboards. It still appears on
terminals in an EBCDIC environment.
Jim Allan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 18 2003 - 13:52:57 EST