From: Markus Scherer (markus.scherer@jtcsv.com)
Date: Mon Dec 29 2003 - 14:28:07 EST
It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards could somehow be squeezed
to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_ (actively, not potentially)
Unicode/10646.
The obvious ones are of course
HTML (at least since 4.01: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/charset.html#h-5.1)
XML
ECMAScript
I do not have a complete list.
markus
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> From: "Christopher John Fynn" <cfynn@gmx.net>
>
>>Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which specify
>>Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base, default or
>>preferred character set to be used?
>
> For RFCs it's not difficult to get this list using the RFCeditor.org
> built-in search engine.
>
> However a more interesting list would be to seek for standards that were
> built on non-Unicode, non-ISO/IEC10646 charsets, registered in IANA, and
> that were since mapped onto Unicode, where these standards may perform
> some string processing that does not conform to Unicode processing rules.
> ...
-- Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 29 2003 - 15:09:34 EST