Re: Panther PUA, etc, etc, etc (was Re: Cuneiform - Dynamic vs. Static)

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 05:57:28 EST

  • Next message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Determine the Code Page of a UniChar"

    From: "Rick McGowan" <rick@unicode.org>
    > Excuse me, but the actual subject of this thread isn't Cuneiform anymore.
    > It has morphed to a discussion of Panther PUA codepoints, so can you all
    > please use a different subject line?

    Except for the very first reaction message I posted which was very short and
    just asking for precision about what Panther considered as user vs.
    corporate PUAs (there was no other message related to it before, this could
    have been a dead branch initially), all other messages related to the
    problem (including the second message I posted) had a distinct subject line
    for this issue.

    I don't know why it came back to the original thread (Mark E. Shoulson, at
    Klingon's headquarters, should know why he did not use the "corporate/users
    PUA ranges" thread I created, or why Deborah Goldsmith at Apple did not use
    the "Panther PUA behavior" thread created 2 hours before... probably because
    of message delivery delays)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 06:27:39 EST