Re: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows

• Previous message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:29 PM, Peter Constable wrote:

>
> One other option is to ask what languages / locales are supported, and
> that is how MS has been documenting things up to now. It's a slightly
> different question, but it's one that is answerable.
>

I think this is indeed what makes the most sense. For example, in an
exchange on this list a while ago about what the capabilities of the
new MS Office 2004 for Mac would be, it was useful to know that it
would now generally support Unicode input and display, but really more
important to know that it would probably still not support
Arabic/Persian/Hebrew, Devanagari, Thai, or (decomposed) Vietnamese.

• Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• Previous message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Version(s) of Unicode supported by various versions of Microsoft Windows"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 17:41:40 EST