From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 05:04:18 EST
On 16/03/2004 17:47, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> ...
>
> Of course Celtic uncial fonts will have appeal only to a limited
> market. But you shouldn't have to respell your words when the font
> changes (as you would if Irish went to dotless-i, since when printed
> in conventional fonts, it does have a dot on its i). We're after a
> particular look here, and so a particular font. That font has limited
> appeal? So does the look we're after. Someone who wants to write
> Turkish in Irish-looking uncials will have to come up with his own
> clever font that manages to have dotted and dotless i's and still look
> okay.
>
Or just use the accursed American Uncial, if there's a version of it
which supports more than Windows 1252.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 05:33:40 EST