Re: Irish dotless I

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:37:37 EST

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: What's the BMP being saved for?"
In reply to: brian@gael-image.com: "Re: Irish dotless I"
Next in thread: Jon Hanna: "Re: Irish dotless I (was: Languages with letters that always take diacriticals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Fine. I concede that this is the case. Therefore, let's change the
> underlying
> form of <0069> to a dotless "i" and let English speakers change it to a
> dotted
> "i" with the font.

I am happy to inform you that "the underlying form" doesn't have a dot.

-- 
Jon Hanna
<http://www.hackcraft.net/>
"…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for
equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: What's the BMP being saved for?"
In reply to: brian@gael-image.com: "Re: Irish dotless I"
Next in thread: Jon Hanna: "Re: Irish dotless I (was: Languages with letters that always take diacriticals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:05:17 EST