Re: CJK U+3ADA and U+66F6

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Apr 08 2004 - 17:13:51 EDT

  • Next message: John Jenkins: "Re: CJK U+3ADA and U+66F6"

    James,

    this is the kind of thing that you should report via
    our error reporting form. Here on the open list, it's
    liable to get lost (no-one owns excerpting issues from
    this forum).

    The contact form can be found on our home page under
    contact us.

    A./

    At 12:03 PM 4/8/2004, jameskass@att.net wrote:

    >Is there a difference between U+66F6 and U+3ADA?
    >
    >The newest UNIHAN.TXT file doesn't have a definition field for
    >U+66F6. The glyphs in the Unicode 4.0 book appear identical
    >for these two characters. One is placed with radical 72, the
    >other with radical 73, although UNIHAN.TXT gives both as
    >having radical 73.
    >
    >U+3ADA kIRGKangXi 0502.080
    >
    >U+66F6 kKangXi 0502.080
    >
    >(In UTF-8:)
    >U+3ADA (㫚)
    >U+66F6 (曶)
    >
    >Best regards,
    >
    >James Kass

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 08 2004 - 18:20:54 EDT