From: Joop Jagers (j.jagers@chello.nl)
Date: Sat Apr 17 2004 - 06:18:33 EDT
In my view ano teleia should have the size and position of the upper dot
of the ":" glyph. Am I correct?
Alexandros Diamantidis wrote:
>* Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> [2004-04-16 11:28]:
>
>
>>weight. (See attached sample). If data is normalized, the appearance of ano
>>teleia will change (since 0387 will change into 00B7) and users will be
>>disappointed.
>>
>>
>
>Yes, I know - I've seen professionally published magazines with the
>wrong ano teleia glyph, bigger and lower than it should be. It was
>probably not even caused by normalization - I think most Greek keyboards
>produce 00B7 and not 0387.
>
>Since language-dependend glyph selection isn't very widespread for now,
>would it be too much to ask font designers to put a MIDDLE DOT glyph
>appropriate for Greek in fonts capable of displaying Greek text?
>
>That's a just a wish, BTW - I don't expect designers to do what I say
>just because I sent a message in a mailing list ;-)
>
>
>
--
Joop Jagers (Eindhoven, NL)
\ \\ // /
( @ @ )
----oOOO----(_)----OOOo-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 17 2004 - 06:48:51 EDT