RE: New contribution

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 19:24:55 EDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "New contribution"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "RE: New contribution"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> > Unless there are behaviours in Phoenician that distinguish it from
> > Hebrew.
>
> Phoenician lacks Hebrew's separate forms for medial and final kaf,
mem,
> nun, pe and tsadi, so there is not an exact one-to-one mapping.

Interesting. Though, of course, Hebrew final forms are encoded as
separate characters, so one could say the behaviours (wrt
implementation) are not different but the character inventories used for
different languages are different.

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "New contribution"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "RE: New contribution"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 20:08:43 EDT