[off topic] Klingon

From: Chris Jacobs (chris.jacobs@freeler.nl)
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 09:37:06 EDT

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: New contribution"

Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: New contribution"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Don't count on it. The PUA as Ken envisages it doesn't provide adequate
> support for anything at all.

Maybe it does provide adequate support for double dutch?

I seem to remember someone (everson?) said to me: don't shout.

There is no official standard which says that you can encrypt messages to me
by translating them into Klingon.

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: New contribution"
Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: New contribution"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 11:00:53 EDT