Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 02:33:45 EDT

Next message: D. Starner: "Re: Public Review Issues Updated"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Maybe in reply to: Language Analysis Systems, Inc. Unicode list reader: "An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Question for discussion:

What would be the potential costs -- in terms of stability, existing
data, principles and policy, saving face, etc. -- of redefining the
default directionality of Private Use Plane 16 (U+100000 through
U+10FFFD) to strong RTL? What would be the potential benefits?

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: D. Starner: "Re: Public Review Issues Updated"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Maybe in reply to: Language Analysis Systems, Inc. Unicode list reader: "An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 03:13:38 EDT