Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

• Previous message: saqqara: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote,

> There has now been nearly a month to gain experience on this issue.
> During this time there have been several hundred postings related to
> locales. In just the last two days there have been more than 100. It is
> very tedious for those of working on character encoding issues to have
> to receive all of this irrelevant material.

Isn't that because reports of typographical errors and the like are
being submitted to our public list, where they get distributed to
some 600 plus subscribers, rather than being reported using the on-line
form as has been suggested and which would be more appropriate?

Best regards,

James Kass

• Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Previous message: saqqara: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 14:15:24 CDT