Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?

• Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Semitic scripts and script variants, was: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Reply: Peter Kirk: "Semitic scripts and script variants, was: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote..

> > You, Rick, also replied on 22 December 2003 to the same posting
> > of mine, so you can't claim to be ignorant of this discussion.
> > You wrote:
>
>You can't just "call for a review" and expect anything to happen.
>Please dcument your opinions and document some facts. If you have
>a different model of Aramaic, Phoenician, and related scripts,...

Ah yes, I'd forgotten about that earlier discussion. You called for a
review, but you never submitted any model document to UTC.

Anyway, this Phoenician discussion has become pretty old and isn't going
much of anywhere on this list, so I'll sign off for now.

        Rick

• Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
• Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Semitic scripts and script variants, was: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Reply: Peter Kirk: "Semitic scripts and script variants, was: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 16:29:12 CDT