Re: Game pieces proposal

From: Jörg Knappen (knappen@uni-mainz.de)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 12:58:11 CDT

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Encoding of script variants, was: Semitic scripts and script variants"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Encoding of script variants, was: Semitic scripts and script variants"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "Re: Game pieces proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ernest Cline schrieb:

> > > What about U+272A PLUS SIGN ABOVE EQUALS SIGN?
> > ^^^^ should read 2A72
> >
> > Hey, there it is! And BLACK STANDS SLIGHTLY BETTER is on 2A71.
>
> So is this usage significant enough to warrant adding glosses in the
> code charts on U+2A71 and U+2A72 or not?

IMO: yes, it is significant enough.

--J"org Knappen

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Encoding of script variants, was: Semitic scripts and script variants"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Encoding of script variants, was: Semitic scripts and script variants"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "Re: Game pieces proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 03 2004 - 12:59:29 CDT