Re: Revised Phoenician proposal

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2004 - 19:46:25 CDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Script variants and compatibility equivalence, was: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Script variants and compatibility equivalence"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Revised Phoenician proposal"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Revised Phoenician proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Peter Kirk noted:
>
>The link from http://evertype.com/formal.html remains broken.

This information is irrelevant on the list, and as Everson has
unsubscribed, won't reach him. If you care about helping him improve his
site, you might provide such information privately.

A./

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Script variants and compatibility equivalence, was: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Script variants and compatibility equivalence"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Revised Phoenician proposal"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Revised Phoenician proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2004 - 19:47:08 CDT