Re: Roman numismatic marks

From: Ernest Cline (ernestcline@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 19:13:55 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"

Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Roman numismatic marks"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Roman numismatic marks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> [Original Message]
> From: Mark E. Shoulson <mark@kli.org>
>
> > Krause used "Mo" because there was no other plain-text way
> > to show M-with-o-above. Hint hint.
>
> What's wrong with 004D 030A ? That's what it looks like to me.

004D 0366 would probably be an even better choice.

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"
Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Roman numismatic marks"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Roman numismatic marks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 19:14:39 CDT