From: Philipp Reichmuth (reichmuth@web.de)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2004 - 02:34:31 CDT
Eric Muller schrieb:
>> Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin script
>> for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode support
>> it, then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode supports
>> the Latin script, with gobs of extensions. So what's the problem?
>
> Latin n with descender, which is not encoded but needed according to
> <http://www.eki.ee/letter/chardata.cgi?lang=tt+Tatar&script=latin
For Tatar, at least, it's OK to use eng as far as I can see.
Official usage is n with tilde. See, e.g., the language law of 1999,
which is available online and which uses n with tilde throughout:
http://tugan-tel.noka.ru/belem/imla
However, I was in Tatarstan early this year, and signs etc. frequently
show inverted e and n with descender where the law would call for a with
diaeresis and n with tilde. It's pretty much of an alphabet in transition.
Philipp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 28 2004 - 02:37:31 CDT