From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Wed Aug 11 2004 - 19:11:54 CDT
On 2004.08.11, 18:58, Mike Ayers <mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com> wrote:
> Better yet, have a generic mechanism which allows you to build
Even better yet: Have the WC3 rephrase their demand that no element
should start with a defective sequence (when considered in separate)
as that no *block-level* element should etc., and leave things like
<span>, <i> and other in-line elements free to start with a combining
character (provided that the said in-line container is not the first
within a block-level element, of course).
That would, IIUC, address WC3's "fears" and would OTOH satisfy the
need to mark up differently any part of a *text stream*.
(Yes, of course CSS allows blobk elements to behave as in-line and
vice-versa, buat that would be the user's responsability...)
-- ____.
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt> |####|
PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 934 821 700 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 12 2004 - 11:16:27 CDT