RE: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Sat Aug 14 2004 - 18:16:04 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"

Previous message: Eric Muller: "Re: valid characters in user names- esp. compatibility characters"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "[mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Doug Ewell

> Seeing that Serbian, Croatian, and Bosnian have been given their own
> separate ISO 639 codes, for almost purely political reasons (they are
> dialects), I doubt it's necessary to worry about erasing the political
> distinction between Romanian and Moldavian.

OK. For managing language resources, what ID should one use?

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Previous message: Eric Muller: "Re: valid characters in user names- esp. compatibility characters"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "[mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 14 2004 - 18:19:07 CDT