Re: internationalization assumption

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed Sep 29 2004 - 03:32:01 CST

Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: internationalization assumption"

Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: internationalization assumption"
In reply to: Rick Cameron: "RE: internationalization assumption"
Next in thread: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: internationalization assumption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rick Cameron wrote,

> Very tantalising!
>
> What characters needed by French are missing from Latin-1?

Well, there's all those arrows... Not to mention all those math
and science symbols.

Seriously, I think the classic answer is: the OE ligatures at
U+0152 and U+0153 (Œœ).

Best regards,

James Kass

Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: internationalization assumption"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: internationalization assumption"
In reply to: Rick Cameron: "RE: internationalization assumption"
Next in thread: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: internationalization assumption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 29 2004 - 22:43:10 CST