From: Bob Eaton (pete_dembrowski@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 06:58:12 CST
A question has come up recently about two similarly looking words that don't
match based on a 'string comparison' due to the presence of the ZWJ.
For example, the two strings /हिनà¥à¤¦à¥€/ and
/हिनà¥â€à¤¦à¥€/ are identical to look at, but they differ in that
the latter has a ZWJ between the नà¥â€ and the द.
The problem is that certain “half-consonant†+ “full-consonantâ€
conjuncts require the ZWJ in order to prevent a ‘full conjunct’ form
from occurring (e.g. /कà¥à¤¤/ as /कà¥â€à¤¤/). The only way to prevent
the full conjunct form is to insert the ZWJ.
But in the “नà¥â€ plus द†case, there is no more conjunct form
than that. So both with and without the ZWJ gives the same presentation
result.
This means that ultimately, the ZWJ is unnecessary in some cases of
“half-plus-full†conjuncts, but it is necessary in others (i.e.
/कà¥â€à¤¤/).
The keyboard I use has a key to press to get ‘half-consonants’ (i.e. by
inserting both the halant and the ZWJ, since that is what is required in the
“harder†case). The problem is I use it also to get the half-न even
though in that particular case, it isn’t necessary. But a colleague is
using the 'halant-only' key, since the ZWJ is not technically necessary in
this case. The result is that the software thinks the two strings are
different.
Having the software think this, is, first of all, a real hassle, since most
users can’t tell the difference between the two and won’t know why the
software thinks they're different.
So I have two questions:
1) What does your keyboard do in this respect when typing "half+full"
consonant conjuncts? Do you only use the ZWJ where it is absolutely
necessary (i.e. /कà¥â€à¤¤/, but not /नà¥à¤¦/).
2) If different, what do you think it ought to do?
Thanks,
Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 07:07:14 CST