Re: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 05:02:41 CST

Next message: Arcane Jill: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"

Previous message: Hans Aberg: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Next in thread: Oliver Christ: "RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> And that further implies that Unix systems ought to recognise and
> discard the BOM sequence at the start of plain text files. If Unix
> does not do so, it is Unix which is failing to implement Unicode
> properly, not Windows.

Bad standards are ignored.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

Next message: Arcane Jill: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
Previous message: Hans Aberg: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Next in thread: Oliver Christ: "RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 05:03:42 CST