Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8

From: Christopher Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 07:22:24 CST

  • Next message: Arcane Jill: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"

    Hans Aberg wrote:

    > This si also another problem. For example, US Federal Agencies may be
    > required to only use software that is conformant to certain standards. Say
    > at the same time that it is almost impossible to adapt UNIX to be strictly
    > UTF-8 conformant. Then one cannot formally use UNIX anymore in US federal
    > government computers...

    They could always use Plan 9 ;-)

    - Chris

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 07:23:16 CST