Re: Ligatures fi and ffi

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 13:43:04 CDT

Next message: Страхиња Радић: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"

Previous message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: JIS X 0208 mappings in Unihan.txt"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hans Aberg wrote:
> It seems me that, when considering a new glyph, one should strive to
> figure if there is any semantic value to it; if not, it should probably
> not be added.

Hans, what the hell are you talking about?

Seriously, have even read the Standard this list discusses?

--
Regards,
Jon Hanna
"If the wolves come out of the walls, it's all over."
- Neil Gaiman, _The Wolves in the Walls_

Next message: Страхиња Радић: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"
Previous message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: JIS X 0208 mappings in Unihan.txt"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 02 2005 - 13:44:02 CDT