Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1

From: Patrick Andries (patrick.andries@xcential.com)
Date: Wed Jun 15 2005 - 10:22:27 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"

Previous message: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"
Next in thread: Ð¡Ñ‚Ñ€Ð°Ñ…Ð¸ÑšÐ° Ð Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ñ›: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson a écrit :

>>
>>
>> 3. Latinate myslite is necessary for encoding those texts in which it
>> occurs together with the older form of myslite.
>
Just curious. What is the contrastive usage? I don't recall any mention
of the difference in the proposal.

P. A.

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
Previous message: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"
Next in thread: Ð¡Ñ‚Ñ€Ð°Ñ…Ð¸ÑšÐ° Ð Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ñ›: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 15 2005 - 10:57:34 CDT