Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 07:44:46 CDT

Next message: Leiter Phelix: "Missing capital H from Unicode range (see 1E96)"

Previous message: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
In reply to: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
Next in thread: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 07:28 -0500 2005-07-06, asadek@st-elias.com wrote:

>Could I then see the documented and minuted rationale for using a
>static (non-productive) Arabic character encoding model?

I doubt there is one, but I believe the decision will have had to do
with the Arabic part of ISO 8859.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Leiter Phelix: "Missing capital H from Unicode range (see 1E96)"
Previous message: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
In reply to: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
Next in thread: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 07:46:44 CDT