From: David Starner (prosfilaes@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 02 2005 - 00:17:29 CDT
On 8/1/05, Gregg Reynolds <unicode@arabink.com> wrote:
> RTL display
> and contextual shaping are relatively trivial. Bidi algorithmics are
> not.
Really? It seems like a pretty simple algorithm to me. In fact, a
three or four page well-defined algorithm isn't that big a deal.
There's freebidi (and ICU?) if you want to use someone else's code.
> Ask yourself, why does Emacs not yet support Arabic et al.?
Because Emacs decided to i18n by using ISO-2022 and took a long time
to get around to accepting Unicode even in conjunction with ISO-2022,
and there's no programmers specifically concerned with Arabic working
on it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 02 2005 - 00:20:16 CDT