Re: confusables.txt, the official standard, and font requirements

From: Andrew S (asunic@mail.ru)
Date: Thu Oct 27 2005 - 04:50:19 CST

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"

Previous message: Andrew S: "Re: rejection of proposal N2677 (was improper grounds for ...)"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: confusables.txt, the official standard, and font requirements"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: confusables.txt, the official standard, and font requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kenneth Whistler wrote:
[explanation snipped]
> Yes, you were mistaken, but not in the way you thought,
> apparently.
I understand. Thanks for the explanation.

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Previous message: Andrew S: "Re: rejection of proposal N2677 (was improper grounds for ...)"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: confusables.txt, the official standard, and font requirements"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: confusables.txt, the official standard, and font requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 27 2005 - 04:51:15 CST