Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Raymond Mercier (rm459@cam.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 05:16:03 CST

Next message: Bashar: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Peter Edberg: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Constable writes
> And why I tend to favour yyyy-mm-dd (AFAIK, nobody ever uses yyyy-dd-mm).

Besides, this is the form used by astronomers.

Raymond Mercier

Next message: Bashar: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Peter Edberg: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 05:22:59 CST