RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Tony Jollans (Tony@Jollans.com)
Date: Thu Dec 08 2005 - 13:33:28 CST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

     
    > I'll wager that, when presented with 08/12/05, more people would feel
    > motivated go to their settings and change it to 2005, than would be the
    > case for people presented with 08/12/2005 who would go to remove the
    century.

    Probably. But, when forced to type 2005 instead of 05, would that still be
    the case?

    Enjoy,
    Tony

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 08 2005 - 14:20:07 CST