From: Raymond Mercier (rm459@cam.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 01 2006 - 04:12:44 CST
Jukka K. Korpela writes
>I'm afraid there's a notational confusion here.
I don't think I am confused: Alt+plus+0165 and U+0165 are quite clear.
>"System requirements
>The Quick Unicode tool is designed to work on all versions of Windows from
>Windows 95 upwards and from Windows NT 4.0 upwards. We have tested it on
>Windows 98, Windows 2000, and Windows XP (Home and Professional
>Editions)."
I had forgotten that paragraph, but it cannot be true that it has been
tested (thoroughly) on Win 95 or 98.
Here I have tried it only on various OS's that I have via Virtual PC (Win
95, 98, Me, 2000 etc) but in that special and limited environment I find
that not even the usual ALT+numpad works, never mind QuickUnicode.
However I am not surprised at your results. The pre-NT OS's just don't
accomodate Unicode.
Raymond
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 01 2006 - 04:14:01 CST