Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Fri Jan 06 2006 - 22:34:23 CST

Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms (unicode Digest V5 #301)"

Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Andreas Prilop <nhtcapri at rrzn dash user dot uni dash hannover dot de>
wrote:

> This [Serbian] glyph variant has been included in all of Adobe's
> Cyrillic fonts since the beginning (~ 1991). See Adobe TechNote 5013
> http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/font/index.html
> http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5013.Cyrillic_Font_Spec.pdf
> Section 4.2 and Appendix A "glyph afii10064".

I like the term "trans-ASCII range" used in the PDF document.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms (unicode Digest V5 #301)"
Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 06 2006 - 22:37:04 CST