From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Jan 31 2006 - 13:07:13 CST
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of John Hudson
> In terms of representing the text of the Leningrad Codex, the thing
we're still missing
> is
> a way to reliably distinguish vav haluma and holam male, and a
solution to this has
> been
> proposed.
Is not HOLAM HAZER FOR VAV being added to Unicode 5.0 for that purpose?
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 31 2006 - 13:14:14 CST