From: N. Ganesan (naa.ganesan@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:16:54 CST
Rick,
Option B.
There's no spelling change. au can be represented both ways.
Don't we already do this by changing the font
between old conjuncts Malayalam (research purposes)
and official reformed orthography?
Naga Ganesan
On 4/24/06, Rick McGowan <rick@unicode.org> wrote:
> The Unicode Consortium has posted a new issue for public review and
> comment. Details are on the following web page:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/review/
>
> Review periods for the new items close on May 09, 2006.
>
> Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents.
> Briefly, the new issue is:
>
>
> 93 Representation of Malayalam /au/ Vowel in Traditional and Reformed
> Orthography
>
> The vowel /au/ in Malayalam is represented differently in the traditional
> and reformed orthographies. This public review issue relates to the
> representation of these vowels. Details are provided in the background
> document.
> http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-93.html
>
>
> If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them by
> submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html
>
> If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please use
> the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware that
> discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not automatically recorded
> as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above to generate
> comments for UTC consideration.
>
> http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html
>
> Regards,
> Rick McGowan
> Unicode, Inc.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:21:31 CST