From: vunzndi@vfemail.net
Date: Sun Sep 24 2006 - 01:48:44 CDT
My apologies.
I made a mistake. At the beginning of the thread a comment was made suggesting
some cjk charctes had been added. The IRG already has a list C1 of cjk
characters that I expect will be added some time to unicode, I was wrong and
thought maybe these had been added.
John Knightley
Quoting Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>:
> John Knightley wrote:
>
> >> Where is there a list showing the unicode numbers for these added cjk
> >> charcters,
> >> and the charcters themselves. I am preparing a document at the momnet
> >> which
> >> requires this information, however I ahve only been able to find the
> >> charcters
> >> in the IRG files -- ie before code points were given
>
> What makes you think any CJK characters were added? I've just looked
> through the FPDAM2 amendment at
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/N2936.pdf and I can see no additions
> to the CJK blocks. I think Mike couldn't find any CJK additions from 4.1.0
> to 5.0.0 because there weren't any.
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Virus Free Email
http://www.vfemail.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 24 2006 - 01:54:09 CDT