From: V Romain (vromain@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 16 2006 - 03:19:31 CST
Many thanks for your answer, Mr Whistler.
Some precisions I am sorry to have forgotten in my preceding mail :
1 -- Martinism is not a dangerous movement and has no sectarian
tendency (in the American and even European definition of the term).
2 -- My example « SI » is not good. It can let think that only
martinists terms are shorten: in fact, all the martinists terms AND
all the terms general to masonry and to martinism can be shorten with
the six-points (also: six-dots).
-- there is in my documentation two other suppletisms, for lack of
character in ALL the existing police forces (at least among the 4-5
esoteric police forces which I know: I must improve my documentation
on this subject) :
- masonic three-dots,
- the sign * with the fonts that are viewing this sign as a star of
David (other fonts are drawing the star with only 5 directions)
3-- There are some examples :
-esoteric 6-points as a symbol (Brazil :
http://www.hermanubis.com.br/Artigos/artigosfr.htm)
-esoteric 6-points as a symbol AND abbreviation
(type on a French heading: http://chbiche.free.fr/OM/Pages/musee1.html)
-esoteric 6-points as a French (http://www.martiniste.org/ and the
pdf-book), English (http://www.ancientmartinistorder.org/), Dutch
(http://home.planet.nl/~amorc.nl/inhoud.html), Spain
(http://perso.wanadoo.es/ccrapoven/martinismo.htm and the pdf-book),
Italian (http://crea.html.it/sito/ordinemartinista/ +
http://www.ritosimbolico.net/archivio/archivio015.jpg) abbreviations.
-suppletism by ::: (http://crea.html.it/sito/ordinemartinista/1.htm),
by * (http://www.dominiosfantasticos.hpg.ig.com.br/id200.htm)
4-- To find on-line free books will take again 3-4 days, but there are
29 image documents :
http://www.hermanubis.com.br/DocsMartinistas/docsMartinistas.htm (easy
to see : just follow the arrow), and 59 documents with the 29 first
similar documents (not so easy to read)
:http://members.fortunecity.com/roggemans1953/nummering.htm
5-- But a question: the character does not exist - to my knowledge -
in any fonts. Is it an obstacle with its introduction into Unicode ?
Gratefully
Romain Vaissermann
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 16 2006 - 06:20:08 CST