Re: Regulating PUA.

From: Eric Muller (emuller@adobe.com)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2007 - 11:21:40 CST

Next message: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."

Previous message: Adam Twardoch: "Re: Regulating PUA."
In reply to: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "Regulating PUA."
Next in thread: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."
Reply: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."
Reply: Mark Davis: "Re: Regulating PUA."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ruszlan Gaszanov wrote:
> So, why don't we split the PUA into character-PUA (reserved for representing non-standard characters) and non-character-PUA (reserved for process-internal uses)?
This problem is already solved, using noncharacters: the last two
characters of each plane and U+FDD0..U+FDEF. See TUS 5, section 16.7,
page 549, or TUS 4, section 15.7, page 398.

Eric.

Next message: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."
Previous message: Adam Twardoch: "Re: Regulating PUA."
In reply to: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "Regulating PUA."
Next in thread: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."
Reply: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Regulating PUA."
Reply: Mark Davis: "Re: Regulating PUA."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 21 2007 - 11:23:37 CST