From: Guy Steele (Guy.Steele@Sun.COM)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 09:59:11 CST
On Mar 1, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Andrew West wrote:
> Guy Steele wrote on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:53 PM
>>
>> While you all are at it, you may want to investigate the other
>> two systems of tally marks described in the Wikipedia article
>> on tally marks:
>>
>
> The tally method of writing the strokes of the five-stroke
> character 正
> zheng (U+6B63) is very widely used in China and Japan, but I don't
> really see any necessity to encode a series of characters:
>
> ZHENG STROKE 1
> ZHENG STROKES 1 AND 2
> ZHENG STROKES 1 2 AND 3
> ZHENG STROKES 1 2 3 AND 4
Allow me to suggest (with some diffidence) that they might
be useful in exactly the sorts of situations that citing Western
tally marks in running text might be useful.
> But how about encoding an ENEMY KILL TALLY MARK:
>
> <http://ww2-aviation.net/polavhist/aces.html>
> <http://home.pacbell.net/mkirwan/Fighter%20Ace.jpg>
Clever, but, I must conclude, facetious; these are not distinct
tally symbols, but rather mere repetitions of some other already
existing symbol that represents the enemy.
--Guy Steele
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 10:06:53 CST