Re: U+289e3

From: James Kass (thunder-bird@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2007 - 23:37:47 CST

Next message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"

Previous message: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Maybe in reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Next in thread: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Reply: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Shohji Itoh wrote,

>U+289e3 on Ideo ExtB, and U+9686 _'s J,
>can say same, or not ?
>U+9686 with C T K, can say different, but..

(Earthlink e-mail program may not support UTF-8)

𨧣隆
289E3 9686

These two ideographs appear to be completely different, the only
commonality is that they may both be broken down to four
components in an IDS. None of the components, however, are
shared between the two ideographs.

Best regards,

James Kass

Next message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Previous message: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Maybe in reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Next in thread: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Reply: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 15 2007 - 23:42:21 CST