Re: U+289e3

From: James Kass (thunder-bird@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Apr 16 2007 - 12:53:25 CST

Next message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"

Previous message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: U+289e3"
Maybe in reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Next in thread: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John H. Jenkins replied,

>> now check it at once.
>> 28e93 = 28e93 = 28e93
>
>U+9686 has an extra stroke in the right-hand component. In IDS terms,
>U+28E93 would be something like ⿰阜⿱夂生 and U+9686 is ⿰阜⿳
>夂一生.

Interesting. Fonts like MS Gothic and MS Mincho do not show the
extra stroke (radical # 1) in their glyphs for U+9686. So, these two
fonts (at least) show glyphs identical to U+28E93.

Best regards,

James Kass

Next message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Previous message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: U+289e3"
Maybe in reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+289e3"
Next in thread: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+289e3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 16 2007 - 12:56:16 CST