From: John Hudson (john@tiro.ca)
Date: Fri May 04 2007 - 20:37:48 CST
Michael Everson wrote:
> But then I think that most of the lower-case Latin letters in the
> standard which are missing upper-case pairs should be given their upper
> case pairs.
And I'm inclined to agree with you on that. But to encode them in such a way that they do
not actually behave as uppercase forms of those lowercase letters seems a less good idea.
I'm looking at the uppercase eszett proposal in terms of whether there is a way to have
this cake and eat it too: whether there is a way to make a plain text distinction between
SS and [ß] that remains compatible with existing implementations and ensures a readable
uppercase display of ß without the need for every font in the world to be updated to
support the new character. [I suppose I shouldn't be arguing so hard: we made some good
money updating fonts to include the euro symbol.]
John Hudson
-- Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Gulf Islands, BC tiro@tiro.com We say our understanding measures how things are, and likewise our perception, since that is how we find our way around, but in fact these do not measure. They are measured. -- Aristotle, Metaphysics
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 04 2007 - 20:40:40 CST