From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 11:53:16 CDT
Adam Twardoch wrote:
> Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
>> Similarly, years ago, I noted that I thought—and still think—that the
>> Nazi swastika should be encoded, for similar historic reasons. It was
>> not just an important symbol of the times, but I seem to think it
>> found its way into text uses as well (as a dingbat, to be sure, but
>> still used).
>>
>> I don't think I could be the one to propose it, though.
>
> You mean there should be another swastika in Unicode in addition to
> U+5350? Why?
See previous reply. U+5350 isn't the Nazi swastika and doesn't look
like it.
~mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 08 2007 - 11:54:29 CDT