From: Andreas Stötzner (as@signographie.de)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2007 - 05:26:36 CDT
Am 6. Aug 2007 um 21:46 schrieb Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin:
> OTOH, font providers could very easily add mappings for U+04D0, U+04D1,
> U+04D6 and U+04D7 to their glyphs for U+0102, U+0103, U+0114 and
> U+0115.
> Surely, the cyrillic breve is slightly different from the Latin one in
> serif faces but 1. it would be better than a .notdef glyph, 2. Unicode
> doesn't think this difference is relevant (and rightly so IMHO), and 3.
> all texts ever printed in Chuvash have latin breves above "e" and "a"
> along with cyrillic breves above "i", so it would be the expected
> result.
Am I right in assuming that you mean the co-called *i-kratkoje* (short
i) with the notion [cyrillic breves above "i"] –?
If so, I wonder if this cyrillic-specific diacriticum is to be called
“breve” at all.
Though it seems to have the same function as the Latin breve I doubt if
the shape of the Latin breve is appropriate for Cyrillic.
There is a naming inconsistency in the Cyrillic Block:
0419 CYRILLIC … LETTER SHORT I
040E CYRILLIC … LETTER SHORT U
but
04D0 CYRILLIC … LETTER A WITH BREVE
04D0 CYRILLIC … LETTER A WITH BREVE
yet in any of these cases the glyphs show the cyrillic form of the
(breve) with strong terminals.
A:S
________________________________________________________________________
_______
Andreas Stötzner Signographie
S I G N A – Beiträge zur Signographie – Willkommen auf
www.signographie.de
Internationaler Arbeitskreis Signographie DIN Unicode-Consortium
Gutenberg-Gesellschaft MUFI ATypI
as@signographie.de as@schlossgoseck.de Tel. +49 -34296 - 7 48 49
Fax +49 -34296 - 7 48 15
________________________________________________________________________
_______
Andreas Stötzner Signographie
S I G N A – Beiträge zur Signographie – Willkommen auf
www.signographie.de
Internationaler Arbeitskreis Signographie DIN Unicode-Consortium
Gutenberg-Gesellschaft MUFI ATypI
as@signographie.de as@schlossgoseck.de Tel. +49 -34296 - 7 48 49
Fax +49 -34296 - 7 48 15
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 07 2007 - 05:30:05 CDT